Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 22, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Thomas Orgis <thomas-fo...@orgis.org> wrote:
> 
> Am Sun, 22 Jun 2014 13:09:43 -0700
> schrieb Ryan Billing <ryjo...@gmail.com>: 
> 
>> The basic idea is I was whacking a 2nd order filter with moderately high 
>> Q.  It has a little less annoying sound and is efficient enough because 
>> you only have to run the filter for the duration of its impulse 
>> response, then reset state variables.
> 
> Well, exchanging the acutal sound is rather trivial, though I wouldn't
> do any on-the-fly processing. I am keeping the original approach of
> including the raw pcm or MPEG data (for !SWCODEC, although I wonder
> where that is used) as static variable in the source. Another minor
> source of confusion is if it is really necessary to convert the data to
> stereo, wasting one copy of the original data in memory.
> 
> Anyhow ... Any fancy sound is possible once you produced a raw pcm copy
> of it;-) I am quite fine with the annoying square wave, as it is its
> purpose to annoy me if I can hear it clearly not coinciding with my
> playing. I'll check out further sound options once the functionality is
> in. Also ... if it should support choosing sounds at runtime. One could
> load from files which have assured maximum size.
> 
> 
> Alright then,
> 
> Thomas

Reply via email to