Sounds reasonable to me. Matt
On 8/10/05, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=RollerReleasePlan > > I like it. Do folks think this is a reasonable plan? > > - Dave > > > On Aug 9, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote: > > > I've put up some notes on how I think the release system could work so > > that it's somewhere more static than just buried in all this email. > > > > http://www.rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=RollerReleasePlan > > > > Personally, I think this plan should work well for Roller and at the > > very least I think it's worth trying out. > > > > -- Allen > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 12:36, Lance Lavandowska wrote: > >> I echo Matt's comments. While I personally feel monthly might be too > >> aggressive, you two are going to be feeling the heat (in the kitchen), > >> so in the end it's your decision to make. > >> > >> Lance > >> > >> On 8/9/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Dave and Allen, > >>> > >>> You guys are obviously biased in your votes here - primarily because > >>> Roller is your job and you've been mandated to schedule the releases > >>> to more fit their work schedule. I don't blame you. > >>> > >>> You guys are contributing the most code, and handling all release > >>> aspects - so I believe the decision is up to you. I'm in favor of > >>> whatever you guys advocate. If you are going to go through with > >>> this, > >>> it'd be nice to see a release schedule so we know when it's best to > >>> commit code. I'd like to integrate Acegi this week or next, but if > >>> there's a release coming out soon, I should probably wait. > >>> > >>> Matt > > > >
