+1 on scrapping the 2.2 release.    It's too far behind the trunk to warrant
bringing it up to these release requirements.

+1 also on the other proposals of Dave's.

Bring on the 2.3 RCs. Hopefully, I'll have time to test an installation this time.

--a.


----- Original Message ----- From: "David M Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Scrapping 2.2 -- was Re: VOTE: Release Roller 2.2-incubating



FYI: I'm mostly done with this work now. I've committed my changes to the trunk.


On May 1, 2006, at 11:43 AM, David M Johnson wrote:
Cliff Schmidt, our legal affairs guy, is insisting that we add Apache copyright headers to all files in the Roller 2.2 release before we can make the release. That's fine, but 2.2 is old news now and I'd like to move forward.

So... since some of us have already put the Roller 2.3 code base through testing and into production, I would like to focus instead on getting a Roller 2.3 release out the door with full Apache copyright, licensing and packaging compliance.

Here's what I'd like to do in the Roller trunk:
1 - Add copyright headers to all files

Done

2 - Implement Proposal_RemoveUnshippables (http://tinyurl.com/rl8qo)

Ant target done, install guide done.

3 - Refactor for org.apache.roller packaging

Done

4 - Put together a Roller 2.3 release candidate (with all 2.2 and 2.3 features)

Almost ready for an RC

- Dave


Reply via email to