I'm not too happy about 2.2 being scrapped - mostly because I deployed it to my site. However, I will be happy as long as there's a 2.2-to-2.3 upgrade script.
Matt On 5/2/06, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on scrapping the 2.2 release. It's too far behind the trunk to warrant bringing it up to these release requirements. +1 also on the other proposals of Dave's. Bring on the 2.3 RCs. Hopefully, I'll have time to test an installation this time. --a. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David M Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 4:21 PM Subject: Re: Scrapping 2.2 -- was Re: VOTE: Release Roller 2.2-incubating > > FYI: I'm mostly done with this work now. I've committed my changes to the > trunk. > > > On May 1, 2006, at 11:43 AM, David M Johnson wrote: >> Cliff Schmidt, our legal affairs guy, is insisting that we add Apache >> copyright headers to all files in the Roller 2.2 release before we can >> make the release. That's fine, but 2.2 is old news now and I'd like to >> move forward. >> >> So... since some of us have already put the Roller 2.3 code base through >> testing and into production, I would like to focus instead on getting a >> Roller 2.3 release out the door with full Apache copyright, licensing >> and packaging compliance. >> >> Here's what I'd like to do in the Roller trunk: >> 1 - Add copyright headers to all files > > Done > >> 2 - Implement Proposal_RemoveUnshippables (http://tinyurl.com/rl8qo) > > Ant target done, install guide done. > >> 3 - Refactor for org.apache.roller packaging > > Done > >> 4 - Put together a Roller 2.3 release candidate (with all 2.2 and 2.3 >> features) > > Almost ready for an RC > > - Dave >
