> My bad, originally it was in case 3, but since the e-mail's been sent, > I moved it to case 5. Unfortunately, still nothing comes of the prog. > Just as a side note, would this have anything to do with the pcdata > involvement, instead of the char_data? I've noticed no other checks > use the pcdata structure. > And yeah, odor, hair, disposition are the last 3 on the list (as the > list ended with 51, I increased from there.
I use pcdata also in mprog checks, and they look just like yours do. The only thing I could recommend would be run gdb on it and make sure it's even getting to that point in the code. Jef
