send_to_char is functionally similar to strcat, so I don't know that you're going to be saving any measurable cpu time by concatenating a bunch of strings together before sending them to send_to_char. The printf family obviously has some performance hit, but it's actually written very well, and I doubt that it would make a noticable difference.
You should really look into getting chprintf, so that could be reduced to: chprintf(ch, "first line "); chprintf(ch, "second line "); ... This makes code much cleaner and more managable, which is personally my biggest concern. --Palrich. > I was wondering, however, if calling send_to_char many consecutive times > like that is inefficient. Is there a considerable difference between > sending 10 or so lines, one at a time, and sending them as a big, single > line?
