[Citadel Development] (no subject)

[IGnatius T Foobar]

I read that article this morning too.  I'm rapidly arriving at the 
conclusion that CalDAV seems to be winning the race against GroupDAV as 
the preferred protocol for remote calendaring.  
   
 This doesn't mean that CalDAV is better, it just means that most of the 
people developing network calendar products are stupid.  GroupDAV is 
clearly superior because its syntax is simpler (which means fewer 
implementation bugs) and it also handles other types of objects (tasks and 
contacts).  
   
 But since we obviously want to interoperate with Chandler (and Sunbird) 
.. it is becoming increasingly likely that CalDAV will soon find its way 
into our development roadmap.  Ideally I'd like to have some help with 
this.