Hi, Ged Murphy wrote: > Firstly, that text is written for usenet not email, which IMO is both > It's a mailing list. So it's closer to usenet than to "normal" email IMO.
> ancient and very unix orientated. > What does usenet have todo with unix? > Secondly, it's rather difficult to write emails in that format using > outlook, which is by far the world's most popular and best email client. > Maybe that would be a good reason to switch the email client? ;-) > So, I would argue that that link is rather obsolete. > Well, it contains several points that make reading messages in mailings lists more readable. Especially: - Quoting the whole email that you answer to (including headers and signatures etc) is useless and only wastes traffic and the readers time. - Writing your message on top of the original might work once, but as soon as multiple replys are written, everything starts to turn into an upside down mess. > -----Original Message----- > From: ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On > Behalf Of Danny Götte > Sent: 13 September 2009 22:03 > To: ReactOS Development List > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4 > Lots of useless information here. It's already in the headers if you really need it. Everyone should know where this stuff came from and to what it answers. That's what your client should keep track of. > Hi, > > sorry for OT, but http://learn.to/quote/ > > thanks > Quotes should start with leading ">" to make it more readable. > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > Quoting signatures / footers is a waste of space. Regards, Timo _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
