Pushing the question (which was the real question in Ionescu's mail...).
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-3-Manual/gnu-assembler/i386-syntax.html

Best regards,
Pierre

PS: Nice to see you back Alex ;).

> What was the reason for the change?
> It would be preferable to keep everything in intel syntax. Especially as
> this is an NT OS.
> 
> It should also be noted that this is in a branch, not trunk.
> 
> Ged.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Aleksey Bragin
> Sent: 02 September 2010 21:55
> To: ReactOS Development List
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48687: [FREELDR] - Convert
> fat12/16 boot sector helper code to gas syntax. Brought to you by the Arty.
> [CMAKE] - Add freeldr and setupldr to build.
> 
> I'm anti-AT&T syntax guy too :)
> 
> WBR,
> Aleksey.
> 
> P.S. Nice to see Alex's post here, in his good old style.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Daniel Reimer" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 11:33 PM
> To: "ReactOS Development List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48687: [FREELDR] - Convert 
> fat12/16 boot sector helper code to gas syntax. Brought to you by the Arty. 
> [CMAKE] - Add freeldr and setupldr to build.
> 
> >  Err, nice to call ppl idiots who try to get the project further...
> >
> > If there are bugs, feel free to fix them...
> >
> >
> > Am 02.09.2010 21:17, schrieb Alex Ionescu:
> >> This is retarded, GAS supports Intel syntax. Why did this require
> >> rewriting everything in AT&T syntax and introducing bugs? And what's
> >> up with calling AT&T syntax "GAS" Syntax.
> >>
> >> I wonder what Brian would say....
> >>
> >> It's funny how this project gets rid of old developers, gets new
> >> developers, and has them make the same mistakes/idiotic things the old
> >> developers left for in the first place...
> >>
> >> Good job!
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Alex Ionescu 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev



_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to