It has already been addressed : Next commit replaced fathelp by the intel syntax version from amd64 branch, written by Timo. No code style change was required by this, no new bugs. Kind regards, Sylvain Petreolle
----- Message d'origine ---- > De : Pierre Schweitzer <[email protected]> > À : ReactOS Development List <[email protected]> > Envoyé le : Ven 3 septembre 2010, 12h 50min 59s > Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48687: [FREELDR] -Convertfat12/16 >boot secto > > Pushing the question (which was the real question in Ionescu's mail...). >http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-3-Manual/gnu-assembler/i386-syntax.html >l > > Best regards, > Pierre > > PS: Nice to see you back Alex ;). > > > What was the reason for the change? > > It would be preferable to keep everything in intel syntax. Especially as > > this is an NT OS. > > > > It should also be noted that this is in a branch, not trunk. > > > > Ged. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Aleksey Bragin > > Sent: 02 September 2010 21:55 > > To: ReactOS Development List > > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48687: [FREELDR] - Convert > > fat12/16 boot sector helper code to gas syntax. Brought to you by the Arty. > > [CMAKE] - Add freeldr and setupldr to build. > > > > I'm anti-AT&T syntax guy too :) > > > > WBR, > > Aleksey. > > > > P.S. Nice to see Alex's post here, in his good old style. > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "Daniel Reimer" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 11:33 PM > > To: "ReactOS Development List" <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48687: [FREELDR] - Convert > > fat12/16 boot sector helper code to gas syntax. Brought to you by the > > Arty. > > [CMAKE] - Add freeldr and setupldr to build. > > > > > Err, nice to call ppl idiots who try to get the project further... > > > > > > If there are bugs, feel free to fix them... > > > > > > > > > Am 02.09.2010 21:17, schrieb Alex Ionescu: > > >> This is retarded, GAS supports Intel syntax. Why did this require > > >> rewriting everything in AT&T syntax and introducing bugs? And what's > > >> up with calling AT&T syntax "GAS" Syntax. > > >> > > >> I wonder what Brian would say.... > > >> > > >> It's funny how this project gets rid of old developers, gets new > > >> developers, and has them make the same mistakes/idiotic things the old > > >> developers left for in the first place... > > >> > > >> Good job! > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> Alex Ionescu > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ros-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ros-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
