Sven Barth <[email protected]> wrote:
Shouldn't it be "_RTL_DRIVE_LETTER_CURDIR" instead of "RTL_DRIVE_LETTER_CURDIR"?
It doesn't matter if you just define a variable using this structure like "RTL_DRIVE_LETTER_CURDIR MyVariable;".
It just matters if you somewhere declare it as "struct RTL_DRIVE_LETTER_CURDIR MyVariable;". If this isn't done anywhere, we could even create an anonymous structure (Microsoft extension to the C language) by defining the structure as "typedef struct {...} RTL_DRIVE_LETTER_CURDIR, *PRTL_DRIVE_LETTER_CURDIR;"
But as all headers out there seem to define it as "typedef struct RTL_DRIVE_LETTER_CURDIR", we should do as well to ensure compatibility with all applications using the structure :-)
Cheers, Colin _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
