If we do NT6, we may want to have latest NT6 instead of trying to stick to an older one and having the same deprecation issue in a couple years?
Also, what about the "idea" of keeping the majority of the kernel and large part of the usermode NT5, but having compatibility profiles that implement/emulate NT6 API functions using the existing NT5 feature set? Is that unrealistic? On 12 May 2016 at 14:39, Aleksey Bragin <alek...@reactos.org> wrote: > Which again brings in the topic of updating the version we are targeting. > Windows 7 would be a minimum target these days, IMO. > > Regards, > Aleksey Bragin > > On 12.05.2016 14:04, Ged Murphy wrote: > >> Yeah it's nonsense. No one drops support for ReactOS, they drop support >> for >> older versions of Windows which likely includes reactos too. >> If they were adding in ReactOS specific code, they were doing it wrong. >> >> The bigger issue here is that a lot of apps are starting to drop support >> for >> XP and recommend a minimum of Win7. If we don't do something about our >> insistence on sticking with 2k3, we'll soon be in a position where no >> browsers will run on ros, as well as a whole other list of apps. >> >> Ged. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
