Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schrieb:
And, ROS is not complete yet. Isnt it more reliable to try to get it
stable for NT5, then shitch to NT6?
If we change now, we are leaving things undone.... and we will leave
them again when switching to NT7, and so.....
+1
I'd like to see a modular system, that can be configured for whatever
compatibility - as far as possible. I could imagine a modular OO
approach, with virtual methods where needed, with lack of performance
being compensated by progress in hardware.
DoDi
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
