No one is suggesting paging the kernel. Stop being paranoid about that. We are speaking about API interfaces for user apps and drivers. Whatever that implies, will be examined on a case by case basis. ;P
On 22 May 2016 at 23:14, Love Nystrom <love.nyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Server 2oo3 might not be used in big corporations anymore, > but I think it's not uncommon to keep running it in small companies > and home servers (due to high licensing cost of Windows server versions). > Anyway.. IMO there's nothing wrong in moving towards NT6x API-wise, > as long as we're not forced to re-architect the *core* of the system > (scheduler, et c). Paging the kernel would be a big mistake. > > Best Regards > // Neo > > > On 2016-05-22 18.42, ros-dev-requ...@reactos.org wrote: > > They are not fucked up, since they legitimately don't care for the 3 > people out there still using 2k3. > And we are not fucked up, we are only pushed to move to NT6+ > > Timo > > Am 21.05.2016 um 06:12 schrieb Love Nystrom: > > No, they are... Not we ;) > Same thing would happen if you try to run e.g. a Vista exe on NT4. > > // Neo > > On 2016-05-20 22.52, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <elh...@gmail.com> > <elh...@gmail.com> <elh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Pale Moon drops ReactOS support > > Date: 2016-05-20 22.51 > > > > 4th scenario - App is actually "buggy" and doesnt check for any export. > We´re fucked up :P > > > -- > There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, > and that's an idea whose time has come. [Victor Hugo] > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
