Much thanks to all of you, David, Matthias and Colin! These are good
news for me. :)
Colin Finck wrote:
The sentence in the Wiki is simply too broad and should be changed.
I highly aggree with Colin to **specify the conditions more precisely**.
It should be easy -even for a non-lawyer- to understand. Implications
and explanations are also welcome. Is there a bold member (or even
better a lawyer) with write access power?
I also suggest to put this legal advice onto its **own page** (maybe as
the very first section on the Wiki's start page with its own icon) and
to refer to that page where neccessary. Currently, it's very hard to
find, because it's on a page describing building ReactOS, which, in
contrast, should be legal anyway.
By the way, on the Wiki's start page, I would change the first link
under "BUILDING" to "Getting the Source code (Subversion)" since it's
title is "Subversion" (and for the case I want to find all the
neccessary information about Subversion).
In addition, beside development, there exist other ways of contribution
like **translating, writing documentation and testing**. Are these
activities also **legally restricted?**
Tobias
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
