On 4/12/07, Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Speaking of transactions -- anyone ever asked for nested transaction > support?
We had a semi-long discussion about that a few weeks back, which you can find in the archives. > > > What about using Ima::DBI? Would that stomp on RDB? You'd probably be better off just using DBI->connect_cached. There's no real advantage to Ima::DBI that I can think of. - Perrin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
