--- Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would expect that most applications need a shared dbh -- anything > that uses transactions, of course. And, therefore perhaps there was a > standard approach.
You know, I was rather surprised about that myself. I've heard so many good things about Rose that I had to check it out. So far, I'm impressed enough that I've wondered if I missing something very obvious. In my test suite, I temporarily overrode init_db to give me that because running tests without transactions is very painful (particularly when using Test::Class). I'll have to start looking into a more permanent solution soon. I like what Peter Karman posted and may use that as a starting point. Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
