I feel like I'm repeating work here -- I've got a similar set of functions that serialize and restore trees of objects, only I'm doing this in a very specific way, keeping only what I want from specific classes (not reusable).
What are the chances of this object_tree code making it into 0.764 or even 0.765? Would you care to share your code in advance? I would surely use it. Thanks! On 4/30/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:37 PM, John Siracusa wrote: > > > Even though there are a bunch of things on my short-term list that I > > haven't gotten to, the change list is already quite large and I want > > to cut a release soon (it will be 0.764). Is there any feature that I > > previously mentioned I'd get to in the short term and that someone is > > dying to have? Speak now or wait until 0.765! > > > > (I think I've fixed all known bugs in SVN. Let me know if I haven't.) > > -John > > > i could have the object_tree stuff finalized by tomorrow if you'd like. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Rose-db-object mailing list > Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
