On 5/1/07, Derek Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I feel like I'm repeating work here -- I've got a similar set of > functions that serialize and restore trees of objects, only I'm doing > this in a very specific way, keeping only what I want from specific > classes (not reusable). > > What are the chances of this object_tree code making it into 0.764 or > even 0.765? Would you care to share your code in advance? I would > surely use it.
It won't be in 0.764. It's too young and I want to wring it out a bit first. For 0.765, if it has tests and docs and we're all happy with the API and behavior, sure. As for sharing the code, didn't Jonathan post it earlier? -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
