On May 23, 2007, at 9:36 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
> Does anyone have any good ideas for a namespace for module that
> augment or
> extend RDBO, but that are not part of the "official" RDBO
> distribution? The
> first thing that springs to my mind is:
>
> Rose::DBx::*
At first I really liked that, but then I read...
> That'd be for both modules that are related to Rose::DB and modules
> that are
> related to Rose::DB::Object.
Which would make it a bit awkward, I think, in the case of a
Rose::DB derived file, and not an object file.
My main worry is that Rose::DBx looks similar to Rose::DB
What about something that builds off the community
RoseX
Rose::X
Rose::Community
Rose::Externals
Rose::Contributed
Rose::xDB might work too - it gets your original point across
without looking too much like the real rose namespace.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
