John Siracusa wrote on 5/23/07 1:07 PM: > On 5/23/07 2:01 PM, mla wrote: >> Where would an extension of Rose::Object go? I wouldn't expect >> it under Rose::DBx, right? I'd expect something like Rose::ObjectX >> in that case (following the DBx convention), no? > > Yeah, something like that. Rose::HTMLx:: has also already been discussed as > a possibility for Rose::HTML:: extension. >
not only discussed but started: http://search.cpan.org/~karman/Rose-HTMLx-Form-Field-Autocomplete-0.02/ ;) -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
