On Jan 29, 2008 10:06 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The "db" atribute of an RDBO-derived object "isa" Rose::DB, but each
> Rose::DB-derived object "has a" DBI $dbh. IOW, plain old DBI database
> handles are used via delegation in RDBO. There's no subclassing of
> DBI classes at all.
>
Good to hear. Do you happen to know if RDBO will tolerate a
DBIx::ContextualFetch based DBI handle?
but keep in mind the new new_or_cached() Rose::DB method that makes a
> lot of the caching discussion in some older threads less relevant
> these days.
>
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Rose-DB/lib/Rose/DB.pm#new_or_cached
>
Yes, I found that one - seems very useful. Maybe something to add to the
tutorial?
Thanks for the help!
-sam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
