On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Julie S wrote:

> Unfortunately, many of these substitutions just reduced error counts in
> things like klearlook--something that sounds like it may go away.

We should probably think about going ahead and getting rid of that as a hard 
code change now, so our stats and sense of progress aren't thrown off.  
Klearlook is a KDE theme we bundle in an attempt to look less crappy on GNOME 
desktops, and I see absolutely no reason to bother trying to port that.  If 
we still need a theme to bundle when the time comes, we can find something 
that's already been ported.  Hopefully, it will no longer matter, because QT4 
is supposed to be better about blending itself into whatever environment it 
finds itself running in.

Plus, on another level, I don't give a flying rat's ass what we look like out 
of the box on a GNOME desktop.

That's a long story involving me and the Ubuntu Studio developers, and why I 
no longer have anything to do with that project.  It isn't a nice story, and 
if I start telling it, I'll unleash a torrent of profanity.
-- 
D. Michael McIntyre 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to