On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Emanuel Rumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What would you prefere to do with KDialogBase ?
Yves has been handling these, I believe by using QDialog and QDialogButtonBox directly. A new base class might be a good idea. On the one hand, our dialogs are probably not consistent enough for a simple base class to be easy to introduce. On the other hand, our dialogs are not consistent enough, and a simple base class might help. But improving the dialogs is probably something that's worth doing in another pass, after the basics compile (assuming that it is easier to continue doing them in an ad-hoc way now that we're part-way through). In particular, we need to review closely our use of apply/cancel vs OK -- our usage is a mess, and is plain wrong in at least two of our existing dialogs. I have a couple of lines of notes on that from an earlier thread, which I should put on the wiki. Fixing these things is certainly easier once we can actually see them though. So I'd say we should continue with QDialog/QDialogButtonBase for now, but do coordinate with Yves whatever you do. Yves, what are your thoughts? Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
