> I never did that, but I do come with classical background and writing > classical score by drawing sticks in MIDI editor and not being able to > work on actual notation sounds like a joke to me. Especially since RG > is able to show several tracks in one notation editor which you cannot > do with matrix editor. Being able to edit data for multiple tracks > simultaneously simply rocks. >
I don't think that's what the OO guys are after, although I'll let them speak for themselves. My usual workflow goes like this: 1) I notate the music using a notation editor. 2) Depending on the complexity of the part and how expressive do I need it to be I do one of these: 2a) I perform it live and record it to a "stick" sequencer for some tweaking, or 2b) From the notation editor I export a MIDI version to a "stick" sequencer and edit it heavily, possibly using several tracks for a single part and including heavy quantization and tempo changes that would result in a completely unreadable score view. In the context of music of which I want to make an elaborate sampler rendition I don't really have any use for synchronized score/stick versions of a track. Do you actually need the "stick" view when you just want a straight boring MIDI playback to check out harmonies and such? L ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
