On 14/04/2016 03:32, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On 04/13/2016 06:52 PM, Silas Mortimer wrote: > >> No problem. I just need to work out how to add the arpeggio notation >> in Lilypond. > > It's hacky and weird. Use the text tool. Choose type "LilyPond > Directive" and insert an "Arp." > > That prints the squiggly arpeggio symbol on the score. I never gave > Rosegarden the ability to represent this natively, and no one else ever > bothered either, so this is what we've got. Hacky and weird.
IMHO Rosegarden *shoud not* become / be a fully-fledged notation / lilypond editor and focus on being the (great) free (as in freedom) sequencer it is :) I mean, I don't want to bash discussions etc. about notation, but Rosegarden already has some of the best notation support for any sequencer around, and personally I would like to see (possible) effort go into bugfixing and improvements in the sequencer / production department. Randomization, 'humanisation', groove quantize etc. (the subject of the thread) would be cool and are IMHO part of those possible improvements ;) Just my two cents :) Lorenzo. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
