Sun, 21 May 2023 08:49:08 +0200 Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsut...@gmail.com> :
> On 21/05/2023 03:38, Jozseph Hogan wrote: > > This is a good point. > > > > If we know that no note is shorter than a sixteenth note then limiting > > this woudl remove notes and rests with shorter counts. > > > > No DAW has this? > > > > IMHO the thing is that doing this 'a priori' might be slippery, because > in some cases you do want a recording to include (some) little > 'imperfections' which make it sound more 'live' / 'human' I would try it, and then decide. I have never heard a musician start a whole note (for example) 1/32 before the end of a bar and then tie it the rest over into the next one. Being no more a 'musician' than a blacksmith would be a machinist, I still suspect that by forcing the use of let's say at least 1/8ths the digitizingware would push the note into the next bar. I'm convinced of this, the poor quality of digitizingware isn't the abundance of human feel (that you'd risk losing) but the exact opposite. Isn't it possible to nix cross-bar ties already in rosegarden? I vaguely remember something along such lines. I say experiment, I would... :-) Make some optional toggleable rules and try them in turn: If less than 1/16 of a note would be tied across then begin the note in the next bar or end it in the current one as the case may be Same for rests Try larger/smaller values, listen for differences. _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user