Don't make access to this too tantalizing. A simple screen is as good as no screen. A complex one is a challenge. Let due diligence and the TPA process curry out the flies. ------------------( Forwarded letter 1 follows )-------------------- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 10:56:06 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: OD.ChristopherJ.Feahr[chris]@optiserv.com.comp Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: first cut on "overview" document
Mimi, My concept of "enrollment" as it applies to this project (although, a different word might be more effective in communicating this) is along the lines of what William has described: simply a mechanism for getting oneself "listed" in the registry AND some mechanism for keeping people out of the registry if there is no reasonable likelihood that they would ever have a legitimate reason to exchange EDI messages with someone who IS in the registry. So I would also agree with what I think William is saying that the security does not have to be ironclad in this regard. We do need to "clear" a certain group of businesses for easy access to the registry, but the worst case of having people listed who don't belong there is wasted hard drive space. The ability to look up someone's CPP doesn't seem that dangerous either because the potential partner will still have some "due diligence" to complete before the messaging can commence. So I see "enrollment" policy as essentially a screen-door to keep to flies out! Regards, Chris At 09:17 AM 7/17/2002 -0500, Mimi Hart wrote: >I guess my confusion stems from whether enrollment could even be >possible. My understanding at this point is that is a time consuming and >paper intensive task.I am going to think on it and get back to you all >unless someone has more info then I. MIMI > >Mimi Hart Ó¿Õ* >Research Analyst, HIPAA >Iowa Health System >319-369-7767 (phone) >319-369-8365 (fax) >319-490-0637 (pager) >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> "Ronald Bowron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/16/02 05:12PM >>> >Mimi, I didn't use the word enroll, but under the Authorization >section >there is content regarding "Having the ability to create a CPP entry". >I >would agree that a separate section on enrollment would be appropriate >in the requirements of the CPP, but do we need to separate it in the >overview document, or simply change the existing content? > >Regards, >-RB > > > >>> "Mimi Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/16/02 04:20PM >>> >I have added my two cents for what it is worth..but I am missing >something when we neglect to mention potentially "enrolling" at the >site, or is this outside of scope? I have turned on "change >tracking"...feel free to obliterate my changes at will. And again I am > >sorry for being late. > >In addition, I added vendors as a player in this.. some of our vendors > >HIPAA solutions are that we send everything to then..they then send it > >on to a dedicated clearinghouse...which kind of throws a loop in the >providre to payer, or provider to clearinghouse to payer model. > >MIMI > >Mimi Hart Ó¿Õ* >Research Analyst, HIPAA >Iowa Health System >319-369-7767 (phone) >319-369-8365 (fax) >319-490-0637 (pager) >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >********************************************* > >This message and accompanying documents are covered by the Electronic >Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and contain >information intended for the specified individual(s) only. This >information is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or >an >agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are >hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that >any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based >on >the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have >received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >e-mail, and delete the original message. > >********************************************* > > ********************************************* > >This message and accompanying documents are covered by the Electronic >Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and contain >information intended for the specified individual(s) only. This >information is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or an >agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are >hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any >review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based on the >contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received >this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and >delete the original message. > > ********************************************* Christopher J. Feahr, OD http://visiondatastandard.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268 discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited. discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited.
