On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 03:03, Martin Skopp wrote: > Hi Developers, > > At 15:25 20.02.2002 -0800, you wrote: > >It probably means that the version of Ant you're using is too old. > >What's the output of `ant -version`? I would expect Ant 1.3 to work, > >and know Ant 1.4+ works. > > Shouldn't a decent version of ant be part of the archive (in a "lib" dir)? > Together with a smart build.bat / build.sh (which invokes ant properly) in > the root directory!?
Nope, certainly not. If you install Ant properly you don't need several copies of the Ant JAR lying around. I build 92 projects (just for fun :-)) on a regular basis so if each one of these had their own Ant jar things would get pretty out of hand. > Don't know about any apache conventions, but that's the way we organise our > CVS sources here... > > Just a idea... I much prefer the 'You have to install Ant' option. > Martin Skopp > -- > Erst lesen, dann schreiben: http://learn.to/quote > > Riege Software International GmbH > http://www.riege.com info: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Support: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org
