Martin Skopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Developers, > > At 15:25 20.02.2002 -0800, you wrote: > >It probably means that the version of Ant you're using is too old. >>What's the output of `ant -version`? I would expect Ant 1.3 to work, >>and know Ant 1.4+ works. > > Shouldn't a decent version of ant be part of the archive (in a "lib" dir)? > Together with a smart build.bat / build.sh (which invokes ant > properly) in the root directory!? > > Don't know about any apache conventions, but that's the way we > organise our CVS sources here...
As Jason says, it's much better to just install Ant. How many open source projects using `make` have you seen which bundle it? That's what I thought. http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/ The only reasonable need for bundling Ant is if you have non-standard changes upon which you rely. In such a scenario, on usually writes platform-specific scripts to apply the custom patches and run the Ant bootstrapper. For XML-RPC, we definitely do not have such a scenario. Thanks, Dan
