Jordi, not sure if ULAs would address Graham's needs. From my understanding, he seems to want "Full-internet" services but constrained within a limited Geographic location (hence the likelihood that the block allocated need not be "globally" announced" .
My understanding of ULAs is that they are "private" though routable IPv6s. Not sure if the "private" aspect would compromise the "Full-internet" capabilities that Graham seeks. Put differently, he perhaps seeks an exception change in policy that requires globall announcements for IP allocations within 12mnths... walu. --- On Sun, 12/6/09, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]> wrote: From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] Address Utilization Criteria To: [email protected] Date: Sunday, December 6, 2009, 4:50 PM For those applications, in IPv6, you should use ULAs, not global addresses ! Regards, Jordi > From: Graham Beneke <[email protected]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:17:40 +0200 > To: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <[email protected]> > Subject: [AfriNIC-rpd] Address Utilization Criteria > > There were a number of discussions during AfriNIC-11 about what > constituted utilized address space. > > The are a number of policies that refer to requirement to > announce/advertise allocated prefixes within a certain time frame. There > also seem to be assumptions by some that an announcement automatically > means that the prefix appears in the DFZ which is not necessarily the case. > > There are also legitimate uses for globally unique addresses that would > never result in the prefixes being announced. One example is the IXPs. > > I would like to open some discussion around this with the view that we > may need a new policy to better clarify utilized address resources. > > I do not believe that there was originally an explicit requirement to > announce all allocated IPv4 prefixes. Hence the large blocks that are > reserved for the DoD and are to a large extent not announced on the > global Internet. > > We have a number of 'killer applications' for IPv6 that would > legitimately use unique IPv6 addresses without ever announcing them to > the global Internet. These include smart grid technologies and RFID. > > I personally feeling is that anyone that can justify the requirement and > demonstrate that use of unique addresses should be able to receive them > under AfriNIC policies. This would include anyone that is linking with > as few as 2 other networks without any plans to route on the global > internet. > > Your thoughts? > > -- > Graham Beneke > E-Mail/MSN/Jabber: [email protected] skype: grbeneke > VoIP: +27-87-550-1010 Cell: +27-82-432-1873 > > _______________________________________________ > rpd mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited. _______________________________________________ rpd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
_______________________________________________ rpd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
