Then I¹m missing the point.

ULAs can¹t be announced. They are for private use (one or several
organizations).

What I understood from Graham is that he want to avoid the ³announce²
requisite in the existing policies.

Regards,
Jordi





From: Walubengo J <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 22:20:02 -0800 (PST)
To: <[email protected]>, Jordi Palet Martínez <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] Address Utilization Criteria

Jordi,

not sure if ULAs would address Graham's needs. From my understanding, he
seems to want "Full-internet" services but constrained within a limited
Geographic location (hence the likelihood that the block allocated need not
be "globally" announced"  .

My understanding of ULAs is that they are "private" though  routable IPv6s.
Not sure if the "private" aspect would compromise the "Full-internet"
capabilities that Graham seeks. Put differently, he perhaps seeks an
exception change in policy that requires globall announcements for IP
allocations within 12mnths...

walu.


--- On Sun, 12/6/09, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]>
wrote:
> 
> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] Address Utilization Criteria
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sunday, December 6, 2009, 4:50 PM
> 
> For those applications, in IPv6, you should use ULAs, not global addresses !
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> From: Graham Beneke <[email protected]
>> </mc/[email protected]> >
>> Reply-To: <[email protected] </mc/[email protected]> >
>> Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:17:40 +0200
>> To: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <[email protected]
>> </mc/[email protected]> >
>> Subject: [AfriNIC-rpd] Address Utilization Criteria
>> 
>> There were a number of discussions during AfriNIC-11 about what
>> constituted utilized address space.
>> 
>> The are a number of policies that refer to requirement to
>> announce/advertise allocated prefixes within a certain time frame. There
>> also seem to be assumptions by some that an announcement automatically
>> means that the prefix appears in the DFZ which is not necessarily the case.
>> 
>> There are also legitimate uses for globally unique addresses that would
>> never result in the prefixes being announced. One example is the IXPs.
>> 
>> I would like to open some discussion around this with the view that we
>> may need a new policy to better clarify utilized address resources.
>> 
>> I do not believe that there was originally an explicit requirement to
>> announce all allocated IPv4 prefixes. Hence the large blocks that are
>> reserved for the DoD and are to a large extent not announced on the
>> global Internet.
>> 
>> We have a number of 'killer applications' for IPv6 that would
>> legitimately use unique IPv6 addresses without ever announcing them to
>> the global Internet. These include smart grid technologies and RFID.
>> 
>> I personally feeling is that anyone that can justify the requirement and
>> demonstrate that use of unique addresses should be able to receive them
>> under AfriNIC policies. This would include anyone that is linking with
>> as few as 2 other networks without any plans to route on the global
>> internet.
>> 
>> Your thoughts?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Graham Beneke
>> E-Mail/MSN/Jabber: [email protected] </mc/[email protected]>
>> Skype: grbeneke
>> VoIP: +27-87-550-1010                    Cell: +27-82-432-1873
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rpd mailing list
>> [email protected] </mc/[email protected]>
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
> 
> Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
> http://www.ipv6day.org
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> [email protected] </mc/[email protected]>
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd






**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the 
individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that 
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, including attached files, is prohibited.



_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd

Reply via email to