Hi Graham,
At 08:33 09-12-2009, Graham Beneke wrote:
So - in summary... how does your proposal differ from the status quo?

Quoting a message you posted [1] to this mailing list:

  "The consensus at the public policy meeting was that global
   announcements are not a requirement but I think that we do
   need to clarify the exact intent and requirements of our
   current policies."

I don't see any reference to that in the message posted about the "Outcomes of the Policy discussions at AfrINIC-11" [2].

Section 5.2 of this proposal mentions:

  "The Chair(s) shall publish the minutes of proceedings of the Public
   Policy Meeting not later than three weeks after the meeting."

Note that there is no mention about the minutes being published in the existing policy.

Quoting a message from the author of an existing proposal [3]:

May i point out that an earlier version of this document had the 10% that you
  now propose, the caveat was the fact that corporations could  match into the
  continent and signup for addresses only to repatriate them to other regions,
  hence the 100% usage within the service region (as in current proposal)."

I cannot find the earlier version of the proposal [4] on the AfriNIC web site. It is important to know what has been changed so that we do not revisit the same issues again.

The incentive of the existing policy is to "to increase participation from the community in the process". This proposal takes a different approach. First of all, it defines the principles for policy development which are :- openness, transparency and fairness. There are definitions of what these principles are about in Section 3.

According to the proposal, AfriNIC can be asked to provide an analysis of the impact of the draft policy (Section 5.1). It is helpful to have that information if we want to determine whether a proposal can be implemented.

If you do not agree with the Chairs, you have no recourse. The proposal addresses that shortcoming. The existing proposal mentions an "AfriNIC Board of Trustees". AfriNIC has a Board of Directors.

I hope that the above summary explains to you how this proposal differs from the status quo.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2009/000813.html
2. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2009/000809.html
3. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2009/000795.html
4. http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/AFPUB-2009-v4-003.htm

_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd

Reply via email to