okay, so i will force my work on doing the rest of the patches cleaned and posted.

thanks for the support.

-piet

Am 24.01.2008 um 21:17 schrieb Jeff Johnson:


On Jan 24, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Peter Kalbus wrote:

thanks for the offer.

but i'd really want to go one by one through them and discuss, what is the best way to get them solved.

3 of them are already checked in from ralf with http://rpm5.org/cvs/chngview?cn=9423 . i will check it with the next snapshot.


k.

1 is a known 'wrong fix', since berkeley db 4.6.21 is not running on qnx if more then one instance at the same time is accessing a database. the complete information is in the thread "typo in os_handle.c for qnx". i got some additional information in the last days, which i've not yet discussed with you. will put the information right now the mentioned thread.


What's the bdb issue? pthread locking? try fcntl locks instead.


so, there's a bunch of 4 quick hacks left, where i'm really not sure, if they makes sense at all. i may post them, so we can talk on them in a single discussion, if that makes things simpler.

when is the 5.0.1 planned to be published. it would be great to have a clean qnx support in it!


rpm-5.0.1 will be published when it has clean qnx support, not before ;-)

73 de Jeff
______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager                                    http://rpm5.org
Developer Communication List                        rpm-devel@rpm5.org

______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager                                    http://rpm5.org
Developer Communication List                        rpm-devel@rpm5.org

Reply via email to