On Aug 18, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 09:34:46 (-0400),
Jeff Johnson wrote:
Yup. The DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND has been around forever ...
FWIW, I personally have not been able to reproduce the issue, have
spent
months and thousand of $$$ attempting. OTOH, I have no x86_64
machines,
and almost no RPM development access has ever been permitted me on
x86_64
...
We'd be more than happy to provide full access to an x86_64 system if
it would help.
If/when I know how to reproduce the DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND issue I will
most certainly take you up on the offer.
Meanwhile, there's been a continuous stream of credible DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND
failure reports from x86_64 (the real correlate is "64bit", there's a
few ppc64 reports too)
for years.
I'm very happy that rpm5.org has achieved the point where the
DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND
issue is being reported again.
I'm not at all surprised that the flaw continues to exist.
73 de Jeff
______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org
Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
