On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:39:00PM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> Hmm, spoke too soon. I guess this is indeed a bug in rpm. It's true
> that for
>
> Requires: (G if H)
>
> 'G' and '!H' is put in the index, so that 'rpm -q --whatrequires G' will
> return 'richdep' and 'rpm -q --whatrequires !H' will also return richdep.
>
> But
>
> Requires: (G if H else I)
>
> is the same as
>
> Requires: (G if H)
> Requires: (I or H)
>
> so *both* 'H' and '!H' need to be in the index. I.e., if we remove H we
> need to make sure that I is installed and if we install H we need
> to make sure that G is installed.
Fixed with commit 469553385ee766792529235a9e3c07efee14ba72
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
_______________________________________________
Rpm-ecosystem mailing list
Rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem
