Bill Nottingham wrote: > Testing used for the following patch: > ... > Of course, it's a complete buzzsaw of a patch. To make this work, > we'd need: > > 1) define one run of this as a post-transaction tool > 2) make it packaging policy that the proper symlinks always be > shipped in the package
In the packages I've worked with, this has always been policy. It's not difficult to ensure that all of the proper symlinks are always shipped in a package. (Using ldconfig to generate missing symlinks is a really bad crutch, IMHO, that should be avoided. Most people don't realize this, but ldconfig (and ld.so.cache) aren't actually needed for a linux system to operator correctly.) --Mark > Opinions? > > Bill _______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
