On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:14 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:07:58AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 18:22 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote: > > > No, it's currently quite stable. We had some crashes in the > > > Berkeleydb code in the past, it's nice to run 'rpm --rebuilddb' > > > when the error pops up and retry the rpm call. > > > > > > (I think that's also how debian's apt works, it calls dpkg to > > > do the real installation work.) > > > > how does running the elements as separate install processes work for > > multilib files or for certain kinds of obsoletes? > > Actually I don't know of any problems. I know that the rpm puts > the erase TEs at the end of the transaction to solve some issue, > but I don't know the exact reason for that. >
What about %posttrans? -sv _______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
