On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:07:58AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 18:22 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote: > > No, it's currently quite stable. We had some crashes in the > > Berkeleydb code in the past, it's nice to run 'rpm --rebuilddb' > > when the error pops up and retry the rpm call. > > > > (I think that's also how debian's apt works, it calls dpkg to > > do the real installation work.) > > how does running the elements as separate install processes work for > multilib files or for certain kinds of obsoletes?
Actually I don't know of any problems. I know that the rpm puts the erase TEs at the end of the transaction to solve some issue, but I don't know the exact reason for that. Cheers, Michael. -- Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} _______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint