On 20 October 2016 at 15:32, Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> wrote:
> After couple of weeks of headache from trying to sort this out somehow, here 
> comes 4.13.0 rc2.
>
> As explained earlier [1], in order to get the release train back on track, 
> pronto, this is mostly just a collection of backports that distros have 
> actually been running in the meanwhile rather than considering all the 
> commits in master by importance as I'd normally do. Plus a few patches based 
> on the feedback I got here. And some security fixes. Yeah, those. Some of 'em 
> have barely hatched and have little real world exposure, but can't be helped. 
> If we'll need rc3 then we'll have rc3, it's not the end of the world. Just 
> bleeping annoying. But on with the show.
>
> In this slot it normally says go to rpm.org release page for details but 
> rpm.org Trac is not letting me in. I'll be damned before I let that aging 
> s***box (soap! it says soap!) prevent me from doing this release and doing so 
> right now. So we'll do it the old-fashiened way then:
>
> The tarball is at http://rpm.org/releases/testing/rpm-4.13.0-rc2.tar.bz2
> and the SHA1SUM is 58dfe53cceb49d76315492d25efa8231b5fcf1fb.

(...)

> Please test and report any anomalies. From rc2 to final only regression fixes 
> will be allowed. Unless of course something really strange comes up, you 
> never know. Or I forgot something absolutely vital. THAT would not count as a 
> strange incident though.

Humm.... Testsuite won't pass....
2 tests are failing because of missing files...
Please apply the attached patch
It fixes:
84: rpmbuild debuginfo dwz                          FAILED (rpmbuild.at:396)
86: rpmbuild implicit suid binary                   FAILED (rpmbuild.at:509)

After that, 2 unexpected failures remain:

 85: rpmbuild debuginfo dwz gnu_debuglink crc        FAILED (rpmbuild.at:468)
277: spec parse                                      FAILED (rpmpython.at:70)

> [1] http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/2016-October/004595.html &
>     http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/2016-October/004604.html
>
> P.S. We'll try to figure out what to do with rpm.org and its content in the 
> next few months, and things might be a bit muddy before they get better. Try 
> to bear with us.
>
> P.P.S. It's good to be back :)
From 5b17cd58f56c91d1cfbcb9d6366186992c3f0ad2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thierry Vignaud <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 02:18:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix testsuite faillures: include missing files

---
 tests/Makefile.am | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am
index 779b92f..7a5cc65 100644
--- a/tests/Makefile.am
+++ b/tests/Makefile.am
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ EXTRA_DIST += $(TESTSUITE_AT)
 EXTRA_DIST += data/SPECS/attrtest.spec
 EXTRA_DIST += data/SPECS/hello.spec
 EXTRA_DIST += data/SPECS/hello-script.spec
+EXTRA_DIST += data/SPECS/hello2.spec
+EXTRA_DIST += data/SPECS/hello2-suid.spec
 EXTRA_DIST += data/SPECS/foo.spec
 EXTRA_DIST += data/SPECS/globtest.spec
 EXTRA_DIST += data/SPECS/versiontest.spec
-- 
2.10.1

_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to