> @nim-nim, @eclipseo: It would be deeply flawed if `rpmbuild(8)` allowed an
> invalid spec file to be used for a package build
@Conan-Kudo The spec is perfectly fine and valid, and the assertion will pass.
At the *right* time, when the parts the assertion checks against are available,
not at `rpmbuild -bs` time because `rpmbuild -bs` needs to be kept minimal to
avoid bloating default build roots.
Arguably, the `keep default build roots small` is a modern concern, due to the
explosion of possible languages and tools. Nevertheless it’s a real concern.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/674#issuecomment-485346272
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
