Another thing is that this syntax makes it impossible to have colons (':') in
the output (eg '%{!?foo::}'), which is a limitation the original syntax doesn't
have'. It obviously has it's own set of limitations and quirks...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/115#issuecomment-520321390
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
