Just to start the discussion, I wonder if support for `%{expr:<expr>?<true>}`
and
`%{expr:<expr>?<true>:<false>}` is too insane? If `<expr>/<true>/<false>`
contains a '?' or ':' char you could use `%{quote:}` as workaround. E.g.:
```
%{expr:%_include_minidebuginfo?%{quote:mini:true}:%{quote:mini:false}}
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/115#issuecomment-525669718
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
