On 30.07.2008 18:09, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Author: sergiopr
Update of /cvs/free/rpms/lastfm/F-9
In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv19968
Modified Files:
lastfm.spec
Log Message:
* Wed Jul 23 2008 Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra at gmail.com> 1.4.0.56102-3
> [...]
- Vendor changed to rpmfusion
[...]
Index: lastfm.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/free/rpms/lastfm/F-9/lastfm.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- lastfm.spec 23 Jul 2008 06:22:11 -0000 1.1
+++ lastfm.spec 30 Jul 2008 16:09:37 -0000 1.2
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: lastfm
Version: 1.4.0.56102
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
Summary: Last.fm music client
[...]
-desktop-file-install --vendor="livna" \
+desktop-file-install --vendor="rpmfusion" \
Do we want to do that (here and everywhere)? Quoting from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
* If upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as
<vendor_id>.
* It is important that vendor_id stay constant for the life of a package.
This is mostly for the sake of menu-editing (which bases off of .desktop file/path names).
Opinions?
CU
knurd
