Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 30.07.2008 18:09, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Author: sergiopr
Update of /cvs/free/rpms/lastfm/F-9
In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv19968
Modified Files:
lastfm.spec Log Message:
* Wed Jul 23 2008 Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra at gmail.com>
1.4.0.56102-3
> [...]
- Vendor changed to rpmfusion
[...]
Index: lastfm.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/free/rpms/lastfm/F-9/lastfm.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- lastfm.spec 23 Jul 2008 06:22:11 -0000 1.1
+++ lastfm.spec 30 Jul 2008 16:09:37 -0000 1.2
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: lastfm
Version: 1.4.0.56102
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
Summary: Last.fm music client
[...]
-desktop-file-install --vendor="livna" \
+desktop-file-install --vendor="rpmfusion" \
Do we want to do that (here and everywhere)? Quoting from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
* If upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use
fedora as <vendor_id>.
* It is important that vendor_id stay constant for the life of a
package.
This is mostly for the sake of menu-editing (which bases off of
.desktop file/path names).
This is one danger of introducing artificial vendors. I'm working with
Matthias Classen (fedora desktop, gtk fame) to draft new guidelines to
discourage this practice.
In the meantime, for any particular Fedora release, it's still a good
idea to make a best effort to keep the vendor constant. You can
consider changing it for F-10+ if you like...
-- Rex
