On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 20:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Not that it matters much, but I'd prefer if we could keep madwifi for a > little while longer if possible without to much hassle. > > But yeah, if ath5k really does all the major things the users need then > it might be time to drop madwifi.
FWIW, does ath5k support the EeePC 701's wifi chip? A version of madwifi that does is in livna-testing. Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
