On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 08:17 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:24 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 22:18 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 20:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > > Not that it matters much, but I'd prefer if we could keep madwifi for a > > > > little while longer if possible without to much hassle. > > > > > > > > But yeah, if ath5k really does all the major things the users need then > > > > it might be time to drop madwifi. > > > > > > FWIW, does ath5k support the EeePC 701's wifi chip? A version of > > > madwifi that does is in livna-testing. > > > > iirc, that's the same chip that is in the Acer Aspire One (an AR2425), > > and yes, rawhide ath5k does support it just fine. > > Excellent. Then I'm all for dropping madwifi (for whatever miniscule > amount it's worth).
<clarification>for whatever miniscule amount *my opinion* is worth (not madwifi)</clarification> Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
