http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351
--- Comment #2 from David Timms <[email protected]> 2009-01-31 14:31:16 --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > So, do we want to allow helper packages like this in RPM Fusion ? > > My 2 cent: Yes, I think those are fine. I'm just wondering is "requirements" > is > the best term to use and if we should use it as prefix or suffix. Would > something like "foo-helpers" "foo-fedora-assistance" or something like maybe > describe better what packages like these are about? I had also thought about prerequisites, since if you install (or maybe run vmware-config.pl) before installing the prerequisites, then it messes up stuff in pam that makes vmware-console to access the server impossible. from online: NECESSARY before you can do something else REQUIRED prior to taking the next class, REQUIREMENT ESSENTIAL knowledge, BASIC, IMPORTANT, KEY INDISPENSABLE NEEDED, MANDATORY, MUST vmware-server-missing-package-needs vmware-server-demands vmware-server-mandates vmware-server-needs vmware-server-preconditions vmware-server-requisites vmware-server-setup vmware-server-preinstall vmware-server-preliminaries vmware-server-building-blocks vmware-server-assumptions vmware-server-preparation vmware-server-groundwork vmware-server-base ===== vmware-server-foundations {building upon - best for me so far} ===== rpmfusion-preconfigure-vmware-server rpmfusion-prepare-vmware-server or more derogatory like: vmware-packaging-fixups vmware-upstream-package-fixups upstream-package-fixups-vmware-server-console I think in another world task-something is used, but I don't really like that: prepare-for-skype etc. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
