http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351
--- Comment #7 from David Timms <[email protected]> 2009-02-01 06:31:52 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > I see no reason why it wouldn't work. 64bit requirements look like this: > > libXt.so.6()(64bit) > > while 32bit look simply like this: > > libXt.so.6 OK, thanks Dominik, While I am sure I tried this and it previously failed to work properly on x86_64, I can confirm that it does operate correctly on x86_64 (F10). Since it is a while ago now, perhaps the issue I saw was while the fedora buildsys was trying to (scratch) build it that I saw a problem... Updated: Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements-1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm - mod Requires (i386) packages from full path to just the filename - add a readme document. - use the %%{macro} style of macro === rpmlint -i: vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
