http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
--- Comment #17 from Lubos Stanek <[email protected]> 2009-03-18 12:04:00 --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #13) > > > @Lubos > > > - Where to get the sfx modules ? Where to store them ? > > > > I am packaging sfxs into %{_libdir} and symlinking them into /usr/local/etc > again, I don't know where to download the sfx files. The packages for other OSs are at the same place as the Linux package. > > Maybe it would be useful to package modules in a standalone package > > (rar-sfx) > > to speed up the review of the main rar package. > Possible as this rar-sfx may be a noarch package, but only useful on ix86 > x86_64. unless I'm wrong. > btw is it relevant to have the linux-x86_64.sfx on x86 ? To paraphrase your question: is it relevant to have <any>sfx on <any>architecture? I do not want to limit the user. It is his decision whether to use a sfx module and what one. The resulting binary does not have to be executable on the creation system. >From the message sent at Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:57:50 +0100: Hi Nicolas, I know that you have been packaging application for Fedora for a long time and your time is short. I am packaging rar for my private purposes so the .spec file could be of some use for you. The problematic part is the sfxs archive. I am currently creating it myself. The sfx modules are distributed in the appropriate system/os distribution package and it is necessary to extract it. Any automated script has been complex too much for me so far. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
